martygreene: (standard WHAT?)
[personal profile] martygreene
"Wakko: everything2.com/index... The human genome is about 3,120,000,000 base pairs long, so half of that is in each spermatozoa -- 1,560,000,000 base pairs.

Each side of these base pairs can either be an adenine-thymine or a guanine-cytosine bond, and they can be aligned either direction, so there are four choices. Four possibilities for a value means it can be fully represented with two bits; 00 = guanine, 01 = cytosine, and so forth.

The figures that I've read state the number of sperm in a human ejaculation to be anywhere from 50 to 500 million. I'm going to go with the number 200,000,000 sperm cells, but if anyone knows differently, please tell me.

Putting these together, the average amount of information per ejaculation is 1.560*109 * 2 bits * 2.00*108, which comes out to be 6.24*1017 bits. That's about 78,000 terabytes of data! As a basis of comparison, were the entire text content of the Library of Congress to be scanned and stored, it would only take up about 20 terabytes. If you figure that a male orgasm lasts five seconds, you get a transmission rate of 15,600 tb/s. In comparison, an OC-96 line (like the ones that make up much of the backbone of the internet) can move .005 tb/s. Cable modems generally transmit somewhere around 1/5000th of that.

If you consider signal to noise, though, the figures come out much differently. If only the single sperm cell that fertilizes the egg counts as signal, you get (1.560*109 * 2 bits) / 5 s = 6.24*108 bits/s, or somewhere in the neighborhood of 78 Mb/s. Still a great deal more bandwidth than your average cable modem, but not nearly the 5,000,000 Mb/s of the OC-96.

[livejournal.com profile] llarian:Random geeky point.

OC-96 has been a deprecated SONET carrier line for quite some time, there are very few still in production.

An OC-48 is about 2500MBps, an OC-192 is about 9500Mbps.

Still a long way from the throughput of my dick yo. =)

(However, the signal quality sucks, since packet loss works out to be 199,999 in 200,000 assuming a successful transmission at all (God forbid!). So, packet loss on that circuit would be approximatly 99.9995%. That's a pretty crappy transmission medium.)"


Oh G-d. So I'm quite frightened, and have decided that Wakko and Llarian both have WAY too much time on their hands. As do I, as my superfluous amount of posts may have indicated. Rawr. Time to go to the goodwill type stores in search of a Valintines Day dress.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-02-07 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skizzybiz.livejournal.com
Damn, that made my day.

May want to edit the link at the top so that it works (i.e., start it with "http://").

(no subject)

Date: 2003-02-07 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martygreene.livejournal.com
well, the link is now defunkt, fuckers... so I just took it out. Grr.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-02-07 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martygreene.livejournal.com
ok. all fixed.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-02-09 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakko.livejournal.com
I have just the right amount of time on my hands thankyouverymuch. :-Þ

(no subject)

Date: 2003-02-09 07:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martygreene.livejournal.com
hmm... I don't know about that... you did afterall have enough time to think that out enough to clearly post. Hmm...

Profile

martygreene: (Default)
martygreene

November 2008

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags