martygreene: (Inedible)
martygreene ([personal profile] martygreene) wrote2005-05-26 05:34 pm
Entry tags:

Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481

Father appeals order in divorce decree that prevents couple from exposing son to Wicca.




Now, while I do not advocate forcing children into a religion solely because you (the parent) happen to be of that faith, I do advocate exposing children to religion. I also have a severe dislike for the state acting in loco parentis, particularly when the parents are not neglecting/abusing the child.

[identity profile] cyfis.livejournal.com 2005-05-27 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
What I find rather puzzling about the entire debacle is that the article state that the judge prohibited the couple from exposing their child to "non-mainstream religious beliefs".

Would it have been acceptable if the couple had been Christian? Jewish? Muslim? Hindu? What exactly constitutes a "mainstream religious belief"? Do you have to register with an authority who keeps track of these things? Have a certain number of priests and religious establishments?

I went to a predominantly Jewish elementary school where it was the norm for most of the kids to go to Temple after school on certain days. I wasn't overly confused by the fact that they went and I didn't, or what the symbols on the dreyle meant. In fact, I found it to be an interesting learning experience even though I didn't share their religion.

I really don't see it's a problem in this case.